Wikipedia talk:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions…
I don't see either as being ad hominem attacks.
- Crystal Ballism
- No Personal Attacks
- How about...
- I am going to revert
- Soliciting WP:Essay feedback
- Use of shortcuts == dick move
- Random thought
- Just notable
- Bloated
- This essay is just ridiculous
- Nutshell
- Contradiction
- New Argument Idea
- What about Featured Article X
- What arguments are valid then?
- Caveat is required
- New one
- Deletion Guideline proposal
- Parallel to WP:Onlyessay?
- Personal Computer Bias
- Another suggestion?
- WP:Pernom
- Othercrapexists misuse
- New article?
- It's useful
- New one: Hopeless cases
- Itshard
- Notinherited
- Let's stop voting
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
Wikipedia:PC2012/RfC 1 - Wikipedia
I do not think the final argument is compatible with our guideline on assuming good faith, and have therefore given it no weight, but the other arguments I have carefully considered.
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 5 - Wikipedia
If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either start a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy/Archive 49 - Wikipedia
I imagine some clients prefer disclosure not be made, to give the article a greater sense of veritas. The cost is zero. The worst that happens is you get caught and are forced to disclose.
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
Wikipedia talk:VisualEditor/Default State RFC - Wikipedia
This seems downright cruel given WP's supposed focus on editor retention/recruitment. Would anyone go to Disneyland if all they could ride was It's A Small World, which was broken and on fire?
- Watchlist notice?
- What is the VisualEditor?
- Focusing on improvements
- Where's Question 5?
- Special credit
- Way too many edit conflicts
- A modest question
- Suggested changes
- Restore site notice?
- Thank you
- Anonymous editors?
- This could be a bad idea
- Super simple intro
- Confusing Source Code
- Category D issues
- I've given up testing V/E
- About 2.1 Question syntax
- Opt-in for experienced users
- This RFC is irrelevant
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
Server calling client – Knowledge Base – kdb+ and q…
Demonstrates how to simulate a C client handling a get call from a kdb+ server. The Java interface allows the programmer to emulate a kdb+ server. The C interface does not provide a means to respond to a sync call from the server but async…
Neobsahuje 9 dgg
Pivot tables – Knowledge Base – kdb+ and q documentation - kdb…
Some notes on the theory and practice of pivoting tables.
Neobsahuje 9 dgg
Pinochos
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:13:26 -0700 From Mailer-Daemon Tue Aug 01 22:16:20 2006 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1G86HU-0005w8-E5 for [email protected]; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:16:20 -0400 Received: from…
Neobsahuje disasterMusí obsahovat disaster
Board Meeting Minutes - Action Items
Home page of The Apache Software Foundation
- 16 Jul 2025
- 18 Jun 2025
- 21 May 2025
- 16 Apr 2025
- 19 Mar 2025
- 19 Feb 2025
- 15 Jan 2025
- 18 Dec 2024
- 20 Nov 2024
- 16 Oct 2024
- 18 Sep 2024
- 21 Aug 2024
- 17 Jul 2024
- 19 Jun 2024
- 15 May 2024
- 17 Apr 2024
- 20 Mar 2024
- 21 Feb 2024
- 17 Jan 2024
- 20 Dec 2023
- 15 Nov 2023
- 18 Oct 2023
- 20 Sep 2023
- 16 Aug 2023
- 19 Jul 2023
- 21 Jun 2023
- 17 May 2023
- 19 Apr 2023
- 22 Mar 2023
- 15 Feb 2023
- 18 Jan 2023
- 21 Dec 2022
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
2006-08
X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Addie Suarez List-Id: ftba-commits.gnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug…
Neobsahuje scovMusí obsahovat scov
odkazuje na služby nejen od Seznam.cz.
© 1996–2025 Seznam.cz, a.s.
